Head to head

mhc.com vs no-protect.com

mhc.com is more readable to AI, 69 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mhc.com 69/10069mhc.com

Scanned 9 hours ago · full report

no-protect.com 49/10049no-protect.com

Scanned 9 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmhc.comno-protect.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 253 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmhc.comno-protect.com
Answer engines blocked20
Training crawlers blocked120
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript3959
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

mhc.com blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, omgili, omgilibot, SemrushBot-OCOB.

no-protect.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.