Head to head

motor-fan.jp vs dinos.co.jp

motor-fan.jp is more readable to AI, 91 against 88 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

motor-fan.jp 91/10091motor-fan.jp

Scanned 5 hours ago · full report

dinos.co.jp 88/10088dinos.co.jp

Scanned 5 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmotor-fan.jpdinos.co.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmotor-fan.jpdinos.co.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript3933,898
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

motor-fan.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

dinos.co.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.