Head to head

myjcom.jp vs tokyo-np.co.jp

tokyo-np.co.jp is more readable to AI, 83 against 65 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

myjcom.jp 65/10065myjcom.jp

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

tokyo-np.co.jp 83/10083tokyo-np.co.jp

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmyjcom.jptokyo-np.co.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4032 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
17 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmyjcom.jptokyo-np.co.jp
Answer engines blocked011
Training crawlers blocked020
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript324418
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.