Head to head

mylondon.news vs 3isk.news

3isk.news is more readable to AI, 88 against 47 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mylondon.news 47/10047mylondon.news

Scanned 9 hours ago · full report

3isk.news 88/100883isk.news

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmylondon.news3isk.news
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
1 / 2518 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
5 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 1510 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmylondon.news3isk.news
Answer engines blocked30
Training crawlers blocked50
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript0583
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

mylondon.news blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, CCBot, ClaudeBot, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

3isk.news blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.