Head to head

nationaleatingdisorders.org vs web3modal.org

nationaleatingdisorders.org is more readable to AI, 76 against 55 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

nationaleatingdisorders.org 76/10076nationaleatingdisorders.org

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

web3modal.org 55/10055web3modal.org

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionnationaleatingdisorders.orgweb3modal.org
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
23 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 259 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
11 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementnationaleatingdisorders.orgweb3modal.org
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript81932
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtyesno

nationaleatingdisorders.org blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

web3modal.org blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.