Head to head

netacad.com vs refinery89.com

refinery89.com is more readable to AI, 95 against 56 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

netacad.com 56/10056netacad.com

Scanned 13 hours ago · full report

refinery89.com 95/10095refinery89.com

Scanned 13 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionnetacad.comrefinery89.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
7 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
5 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 1511 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementnetacad.comrefinery89.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript82,922
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

netacad.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

refinery89.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.