Head to head

new-programmatic.com vs dexerto.com

dexerto.com is more readable to AI, 78 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

new-programmatic.com 49/10049new-programmatic.com

Scanned 23 hours ago · full report

dexerto.com 78/10078dexerto.com

Scanned 23 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionnew-programmatic.comdexerto.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4028 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
3 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 158 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementnew-programmatic.comdexerto.com
Answer engines blocked04
Training crawlers blocked011
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript21,363
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnoyes

new-programmatic.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

dexerto.com blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot, Scrapy, YouBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.