Head to head

northropgrumman.com vs garmtech.com

garmtech.com is more readable to AI, 90 against 80 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

northropgrumman.com 80/10080northropgrumman.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

garmtech.com 90/10090garmtech.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionnorthropgrumman.comgarmtech.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
38 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
16 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
17 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 158 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementnorthropgrumman.comgarmtech.com
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked80
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript154299
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

northropgrumman.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, CCBot, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot.

garmtech.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.