Head to head

ntsb.gov vs austintexas.gov

austintexas.gov is more readable to AI, 76 against 70 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

ntsb.gov 70/10070ntsb.gov

Scanned 11 minutes ago · full report

austintexas.gov 76/10076austintexas.gov

Scanned 11 minutes ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionntsb.govaustintexas.gov
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementntsb.govaustintexas.gov
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript5331,267
Structured datanono
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

ntsb.gov blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

austintexas.gov blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.