Head to head

nuernberg.de vs apotheken-umschau.de

nuernberg.de is more readable to AI, 77 against 72 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

nuernberg.de 77/10077nuernberg.de

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

apotheken-umschau.de 72/10072apotheken-umschau.de

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionnuernberg.deapotheken-umschau.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4020 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
25 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
6 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 1510 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementnuernberg.deapotheken-umschau.de
Answer engines blocked02
Training crawlers blocked012
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript1,0901,179
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

nuernberg.de blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

apotheken-umschau.de blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Diffbot, FacebookBot, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgili, omgilibot, YouBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.