Head to head

oschina.net vs xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net is more readable to AI, 88 against 51 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

oschina.net 51/10051oschina.net

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net 88/10088xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionoschina.netxn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
5 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementoschina.netxn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript7384
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

oschina.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.