Head to head

pelmorex.com vs danatoto72.com

pelmorex.com is more readable to AI, 96 against 84 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

pelmorex.com 96/10096pelmorex.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

danatoto72.com 84/10084danatoto72.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpelmorex.comdanatoto72.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4038 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2017 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
11 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpelmorex.comdanatoto72.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript88624,725
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtyesno

pelmorex.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

danatoto72.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.