Head to head

pictbland.net vs xonbet.net

xonbet.net is more readable to AI, 90 against 60 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

pictbland.net 60/10060pictbland.net

Scanned 10 hours ago · full report

xonbet.net 90/10090xonbet.net

Scanned 10 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpictbland.netxonbet.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
13 / 2525 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpictbland.netxonbet.net
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked30
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript682,217
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

pictbland.net blocks anthropic-ai, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Google-Extended, GPTBot.

xonbet.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.