Head to head

pirateswap.com vs optisigns.com

pirateswap.com is more readable to AI, 75 against 69 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

pirateswap.com 75/10075pirateswap.com

Scanned 2 days ago · full report

optisigns.com 69/10069optisigns.com

Scanned 2 days ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpirateswap.comoptisigns.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
31 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 206 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
3 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpirateswap.comoptisigns.com
Answer engines blocked20
Training crawlers blocked60
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript2,0462,001
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

pirateswap.com blocks anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, cohere-ai, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, omgilibot.

optisigns.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.