Head to head

podcastaddict.com vs breakingdefense.com

breakingdefense.com is more readable to AI, 90 against 77 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

podcastaddict.com 77/10077podcastaddict.com

Scanned 16 hours ago · full report

breakingdefense.com 90/10090breakingdefense.com

Scanned 16 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpodcastaddict.combreakingdefense.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
22 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
24 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
9 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpodcastaddict.combreakingdefense.com
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked40
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript4971,271
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtyesno

podcastaddict.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, ClaudeBot, SemrushBot-OCOB.

breakingdefense.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.