Head to head

poppen.de vs mein-schoener-garten.de

poppen.de is more readable to AI, 88 against 78 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

poppen.de 88/10088poppen.de

Scanned 19 hours ago · full report

mein-schoener-garten.de 78/10078mein-schoener-garten.de

Scanned 19 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpoppen.demein-schoener-garten.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4030 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
3 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpoppen.demein-schoener-garten.de
Answer engines blocked01
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript2,1872,186
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

poppen.de blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

mein-schoener-garten.de blocks Amazonbot, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, FacebookBot, Google-CloudVertexBot, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, Timpibot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.