Head to head

presse-citron.net vs osaio.net

presse-citron.net is more readable to AI, 87 against 50 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

presse-citron.net 87/10087presse-citron.net

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

osaio.net 50/10050osaio.net

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpresse-citron.netosaio.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all, in rob…
36 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
23 / 256 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
8 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpresse-citron.netosaio.net
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked100
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2,14387
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtyesno

presse-citron.net blocks AI2Bot, Bytespider, CCBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, ImagesiftBot, Kangaroo Bot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgilibot, PanguBot, Scrapy, Timpibot.

osaio.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.