Head to head

presse-citron.net vs wpx.net

presse-citron.net is more readable to AI, 94 against 73 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

presse-citron.net 94/10094presse-citron.net

Scanned 8 minutes ago · full report

wpx.net 73/10073wpx.net

Scanned 8 minutes ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionpresse-citron.netwpx.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
38 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
23 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
8 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementpresse-citron.netwpx.net
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked100
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2,1152,015
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtyesno

presse-citron.net blocks AI2Bot, Bytespider, CCBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, ImagesiftBot, Kangaroo Bot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgilibot, PanguBot, Scrapy, Timpibot.

wpx.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.