Head to head

prmovies.exchange vs infosec.exchange

prmovies.exchange is more readable to AI, 80 against 53 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

prmovies.exchange 80/10080prmovies.exchange

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

infosec.exchange 53/10053infosec.exchange

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionprmovies.exchangeinfosec.exchange
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 256 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementprmovies.exchangeinfosec.exchange
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked71
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript5,4692
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

prmovies.exchange blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

infosec.exchange blocks GPTBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.