Head to head

quotidiano.net vs 4gamer.net

quotidiano.net is more readable to AI, 81 against 74 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

quotidiano.net 81/10081quotidiano.net

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

4gamer.net 74/100744gamer.net

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionquotidiano.net4gamer.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 207 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementquotidiano.net4gamer.net
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked40
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript3,4251,542
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

quotidiano.net blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot.

4gamer.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.