Head to head

richrelevance.com vs dexerto.com

richrelevance.com is more readable to AI, 84 against 78 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

richrelevance.com 84/10084richrelevance.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

dexerto.com 78/10078dexerto.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionrichrelevance.comdexerto.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4028 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
10 / 158 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementrichrelevance.comdexerto.com
Answer engines blocked04
Training crawlers blocked011
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesyes
Words of text without JavaScript1,3501,363
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

richrelevance.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

dexerto.com blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot, Scrapy, YouBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.