Head to head

satta143.net vs vectorworks.net

vectorworks.net is more readable to AI, 80 against 69 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

satta143.net 69/10069satta143.net

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

vectorworks.net 80/10080vectorworks.net

Scanned 7 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionsatta143.netvectorworks.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
32 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementsatta143.netvectorworks.net
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript4,070354
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

satta143.net blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

vectorworks.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.