Head to head

sensorsdata.com vs bfd269.com

sensorsdata.com is more readable to AI, 66 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

sensorsdata.com 66/10066sensorsdata.com

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

bfd269.com 49/10049bfd269.com

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionsensorsdata.combfd269.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 2514 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementsensorsdata.combfd269.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript5181,918
Structured datanono
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

sensorsdata.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

bfd269.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.