Head to head

sex-studentki.guru vs xnhau.guru

sex-studentki.guru is more readable to AI, 70 against 56 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

sex-studentki.guru 70/10070sex-studentki.guru

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

xnhau.guru 56/10056xnhau.guru

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionsex-studentki.guruxnhau.guru
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementsex-studentki.guruxnhau.guru
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript2,5041,988
Structured datanono
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

sex-studentki.guru blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

xnhau.guru blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.