Head to head

shef.ac.uk vs gq-magazine.co.uk

gq-magazine.co.uk is more readable to AI, 82 against 79 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

shef.ac.uk 79/10079shef.ac.uk

Scanned 16 hours ago · full report

gq-magazine.co.uk 82/10082gq-magazine.co.uk

Scanned 16 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionshef.ac.ukgq-magazine.co.uk
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4034 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
24 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementshef.ac.ukgq-magazine.co.uk
Answer engines blocked010
Training crawlers blocked011
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,0922,002
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.