Head to head

simon.com vs diepresse.com

diepresse.com is more readable to AI, 80 against 35 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

simon.com 35/10035simon.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

diepresse.com 80/10080diepresse.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionsimon.comdiepresse.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
17 / 4036 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
6 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
5 / 2016 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
5 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementsimon.comdiepresse.com
Answer engines blocked64
Training crawlers blocked1711
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript71,457
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtyesno

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.