Head to head

sitelutions.com vs federalnewsnetwork.com

federalnewsnetwork.com is more readable to AI, 87 against 74 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

sitelutions.com 74/10074sitelutions.com

Scanned 9 hours ago · full report

federalnewsnetwork.com 87/10087federalnewsnetwork.com

Scanned 9 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionsitelutions.comfederalnewsnetwork.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4036 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
20 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementsitelutions.comfederalnewsnetwork.com
Answer engines blocked06
Training crawlers blocked010
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,5321,540
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

sitelutions.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

federalnewsnetwork.com blocks anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.