Head to head

skyscanner.com.br vs diariodocentrodomundo.com.br

diariodocentrodomundo.com.br is more readable to AI, 70 against 52 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

skyscanner.com.br 52/10052skyscanner.com.br

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

diariodocentrodomundo.com.br 70/10070diariodocentrodomundo.com.br

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionskyscanner.com.brdiariodocentrodomundo.com.br
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
3 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
5 / 2016 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementskyscanner.com.brdiariodocentrodomundo.com.br
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked10
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript1978
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

skyscanner.com.br blocks Meta-ExternalAgent.

diariodocentrodomundo.com.br blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.