Head to head

spectator.co.uk vs faroutmagazine.co.uk

spectator.co.uk is more readable to AI, 88 against 72 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

spectator.co.uk 88/10088spectator.co.uk

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

faroutmagazine.co.uk 72/10072faroutmagazine.co.uk

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionspectator.co.ukfaroutmagazine.co.uk
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
10 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementspectator.co.ukfaroutmagazine.co.uk
Answer engines blocked01
Training crawlers blocked02
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript1,1731,761
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

spectator.co.uk blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

faroutmagazine.co.uk blocks CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Google-Extended, GPTBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.