Head to head

sweet.tv vs live-soccer.tv

sweet.tv is more readable to AI, 82 against 52 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

sweet.tv 82/10082sweet.tv

Scanned 23 hours ago · full report

live-soccer.tv 52/10052live-soccer.tv

Scanned 23 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionsweet.tvlive-soccer.tv
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
12 / 256 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
17 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
8 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementsweet.tvlive-soccer.tv
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1475
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtyesno

sweet.tv blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

live-soccer.tv blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.