Head to head

techinasia.com vs christianitytoday.com

christianitytoday.com is more readable to AI, 85 against 46 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

techinasia.com 46/10046techinasia.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

christianitytoday.com 85/10085christianitytoday.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontechinasia.comchristianitytoday.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
23 / 4033 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
4 / 2523 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
12 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 1510 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtechinasia.comchristianitytoday.com
Answer engines blocked05
Training crawlers blocked08
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesyes
Words of text without JavaScript82,115
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

techinasia.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

christianitytoday.com blocks anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, ClaudeBot, Diffbot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.