Head to head
tempo.co vs nu.com.co
nu.com.co is more readable to AI, 88 against 62 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.
Scanned 17 hours ago · full report
Scanned 17 hours ago · full report
Where the difference is by dimension
| Dimension | tempo.co | nu.com.co |
|---|---|---|
| Reach Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h… |
19 / 40 | 40 / 40 |
| Readability Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex… |
19 / 25 | 20 / 25 |
| Structure Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact… |
18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Attribution Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and… |
3 / 15 | 3 / 15 |
The measurements side by side
| Measurement | tempo.co | nu.com.co |
|---|---|---|
| Answer engines blocked | 8 | 0 |
| Training crawlers blocked | 12 | 0 |
| Refuses AI agents at the edge | yes | no |
| Words of text without JavaScript | 1,370 | 817 |
| Structured data | yes | yes |
| Sitemap | yes | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
tempo.co blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, Scrapy, Timpibot, YouBot.
nu.com.co blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.
Compare your own site
Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.