Head to head

testmozusercontent.com vs sealsubscriptions.com

sealsubscriptions.com is more readable to AI, 88 against 68 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

testmozusercontent.com 68/10068testmozusercontent.com

Scanned 16 hours ago · full report

sealsubscriptions.com 88/10088sealsubscriptions.com

Scanned 16 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontestmozusercontent.comsealsubscriptions.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
20 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 2017 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 156 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtestmozusercontent.comsealsubscriptions.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked10
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript886524
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnoyes

testmozusercontent.com blocks SemrushBot-OCOB.

sealsubscriptions.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.