Head to head

texasattorneygeneral.gov vs voa.gov

voa.gov is more readable to AI, 78 against 60 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

texasattorneygeneral.gov 60/10060texasattorneygeneral.gov

Scanned 5 minutes ago · full report

voa.gov 78/10078voa.gov

Scanned 54 minutes ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontexasattorneygeneral.govvoa.gov
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all, in rob…
35 / 4034 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
15 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtexasattorneygeneral.govvoa.gov
Answer engines blocked60
Training crawlers blocked60
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript617498
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

texasattorneygeneral.gov blocks Amazonbot, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, Bingbot, Bytespider, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, facebookexternalhit, PerplexityBot, Scrapy, SemrushBot-OCOB, TikTokSpider.

voa.gov blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.