Head to head

tkor138.com vs bang-olufsen.com

bang-olufsen.com is more readable to AI, 84 against 70 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

tkor138.com 70/10070tkor138.com

Scanned 2 days ago · full report

bang-olufsen.com 84/10084bang-olufsen.com

Scanned 2 days ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontkor138.combang-olufsen.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2515 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtkor138.combang-olufsen.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript12,965273
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

tkor138.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

bang-olufsen.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.