Head to head

tmcnet.com vs dibokepindo.com

dibokepindo.com is more readable to AI, 75 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

tmcnet.com 49/10049tmcnet.com

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

dibokepindo.com 75/10075dibokepindo.com

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontmcnet.comdibokepindo.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
23 / 4024 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtmcnet.comdibokepindo.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked10
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesyes
Words of text without JavaScript1,461315
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

tmcnet.com blocks SemrushBot-OCOB.

dibokepindo.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.