Head to head

topspeed.com vs lumapps.com

lumapps.com is more readable to AI, 96 against 81 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

topspeed.com 81/10081topspeed.com

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

lumapps.com 96/10096lumapps.com

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontopspeed.comlumapps.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
17 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 1511 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtopspeed.comlumapps.com
Answer engines blocked40
Training crawlers blocked100
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,2861,768
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

topspeed.com blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot, Scrapy, YouBot.

lumapps.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.