Head to head

tt.com vs cybersecurityventures.com

cybersecurityventures.com is more readable to AI, 82 against 75 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

tt.com 75/10075tt.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

cybersecurityventures.com 82/10082cybersecurityventures.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontt.comcybersecurityventures.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
16 / 2516 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
15 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtt.comcybersecurityventures.com
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked50
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript6661,211
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

tt.com blocks anthropic-ai, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, Scrapy.

cybersecurityventures.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.