Head to head

tters.jp vs 24028-net.jp

24028-net.jp is more readable to AI, 81 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

tters.jp 49/10049tters.jp

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

24028-net.jp 81/1008124028-net.jp

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiontters.jp24028-net.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
22 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
16 / 2518 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 2016 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementtters.jp24028-net.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript194785
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

tters.jp blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

24028-net.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.