Head to head

ulluuncut.to vs voir-anime.to

ulluuncut.to is more readable to AI, 86 against 67 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

ulluuncut.to 86/10086ulluuncut.to

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

voir-anime.to 67/10067voir-anime.to

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionulluuncut.tovoir-anime.to
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
3 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementulluuncut.tovoir-anime.to
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript312365
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

ulluuncut.to blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

voir-anime.to blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.