Head to head

uni-bielefeld.de vs hessenschau.de

hessenschau.de is more readable to AI, 87 against 77 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

uni-bielefeld.de 77/10077uni-bielefeld.de

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

hessenschau.de 87/10087hessenschau.de

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionuni-bielefeld.dehessenschau.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4037 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2523 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementuni-bielefeld.dehessenschau.de
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked112
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript9592,897
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.