Head to head

vermont.gov vs aviationweather.gov

aviationweather.gov is more readable to AI, 70 against 68 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

vermont.gov 68/10068vermont.gov

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

aviationweather.gov 70/10070aviationweather.gov

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionvermont.govaviationweather.gov
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
31 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
23 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementvermont.govaviationweather.gov
Answer engines blocked60
Training crawlers blocked140
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript904501
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.