Head to head

wacoal.jp vs nakanohito.jp

wacoal.jp is more readable to AI, 67 against 51 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

wacoal.jp 67/10067wacoal.jp

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

nakanohito.jp 51/10051nakanohito.jp

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionwacoal.jpnakanohito.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
17 / 254 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
6 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementwacoal.jpnakanohito.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked10
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2552
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

wacoal.jp blocks SemrushBot-OCOB.

nakanohito.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.