Head to head

web3modal.org vs nationaleatingdisorders.org

nationaleatingdisorders.org is more readable to AI, 76 against 55 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

web3modal.org 55/10055web3modal.org

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

nationaleatingdisorders.org 76/10076nationaleatingdisorders.org

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionweb3modal.orgnationaleatingdisorders.org
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
9 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 1511 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementweb3modal.orgnationaleatingdisorders.org
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript32819
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnoyes

web3modal.org blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

nationaleatingdisorders.org blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.