Head to head

wellcomecollection.org vs acefitness.org

acefitness.org is more readable to AI, 82 against 67 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

wellcomecollection.org 67/10067wellcomecollection.org

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

acefitness.org 82/10082acefitness.org

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionwellcomecollection.orgacefitness.org
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
38 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2516 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementwellcomecollection.orgacefitness.org
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked90
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript6961,142
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

wellcomecollection.org blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot, Scrapy.

acefitness.org blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.