Head to head

wpr.org vs openfoodfacts.org

wpr.org is more readable to AI, 88 against 56 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

wpr.org 88/10088wpr.org

Scanned 2 hours ago · full report

openfoodfacts.org 56/10056openfoodfacts.org

Scanned 2 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionwpr.orgopenfoodfacts.org
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4020 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2510 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
10 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementwpr.orgopenfoodfacts.org
Answer engines blocked16
Training crawlers blocked179
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript833506
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.