Head to head

wunderkind.co vs tempo.co

wunderkind.co is more readable to AI, 89 against 62 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

wunderkind.co 89/10089wunderkind.co

Scanned 50 minutes ago · full report

tempo.co 62/10062tempo.co

Scanned 52 minutes ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionwunderkind.cotempo.co
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4019 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
6 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementwunderkind.cotempo.co
Answer engines blocked08
Training crawlers blocked012
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript2,5491,370
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.