Head to head

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net vs oschina.net

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net is more readable to AI, 88 against 51 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net 88/10088xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

oschina.net 51/10051oschina.net

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionxn--3-wxfc3gwbi.netoschina.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 255 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
3 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementxn--3-wxfc3gwbi.netoschina.net
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript3847
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

xn--3-wxfc3gwbi.net blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

oschina.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.