Head to head

xueqiu.com vs lingojam.com

lingojam.com is more readable to AI, 66 against 47 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

xueqiu.com 47/10047xueqiu.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

lingojam.com 66/10066lingojam.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionxueqiu.comlingojam.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
4 / 2515 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 206 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementxueqiu.comlingojam.com
Answer engines blocked40
Training crawlers blocked110
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2115
Structured datanono
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.